Visitors' civil comments encouraged.

pro-life


Toxic Meme Alert: Lies of the "Pro-Life" Movement sticky icon

Now that Stupak-Pitts has exposed the machinations of the "pro-life" movement in the most obvious and unflattering manner, I've been thinking a lot about the different ways in which their movement lies, not just to pro-choicers, but to their own faithful believers. Here are some things I've come up with: as always, feel free to add your own in comments. Here we go!

Lie #1: We are pro-life.

Yup, that's a big fucking lie right there. Are they anti-war? No. Are they anti-death penalty? Hey-ell no. Thus, they are not pro-life in any meaningful sense of the word. What they are is anti-choice. But remember they're not anti-THEIR choice; they're anti-YOUR choice, wimminz. They think you are evil because of some ridiculous story about a snake and an apple tree.  For an illustration of this insanity, see the fact that until very recently, the RNC's Cigna health plan covered elective abortions...until their rabid anti-choice base found out and put a stop to it. Sort of.

Dear Pro-Life Community: We Don't Trust You. That's Why. sticky icon

Sorry, Sarah
Sorry, Sarah

At Violet Socks' place, there is an incredible discussion going on regarding why mainstream feminists trashed Sarah Palin so viciously, and even made up lies about her to justify their hatred. There are about 300 comments in response. I highly recommend that you read it if you have the time.

Make no mistake, soon-to-be-ex-Governor Palin can easily be legitimately criticized on the issues. As a liberal, I don't agree with her on much. But the amount of manufactured outrages that were passed around, from Trig's parentage (still going on, at least in Andrew Sullivan's diseased mind) to the rape kit smear to the banning books smear, all passed on by feminists...it is utterly baffling to Dr. Socks. Why all the hatred and vitriol for this woman? Why couldn't they just tell the truth about her and have done with it?

Although there was no doubt some elitism involved (her accent! her lack of Ivy leage education! that hair!), to me, the answer is clear, and comes down to one word: Pro-Life.

How Can There Be A Compromise? sticky icon

How Can There Be A Compromise?
 
If I see black and you see white and we really believe in what we see can we agree to compromise on gray? If the issue being discussed is nothing more important than whether to put onions on a burger or not, perhaps we can compromise. Although I warn you, I take my onions seriously!
 
 If you are adamantly Pro-life and will accept nothing less and I am adamantly Pro-Choice and will accept nothing less than a woman’s right to choose, where is the middle ground? Anyone that believes we can compromise on this issue has serious reality problems. Or they are deliberately obfuscating.
 
 Some things, on both sides of an issue, are not compromiseable. (I know it’s not a word, but when I can’t find one that works for me I make it up. Kinda like what politicians and media do with the truth. At least mine is an innocuous silliness offensive to none but the grammar police.)