Visitors' civil comments encouraged.

Musings on American Culture, and How to Change it for the Better


madamab - Posted on 01 February 2009

Women Are Still Wearing These
Women Are Still Wearing These

This week, I have been thinking about American culture, and shaking my head in disgust. For example, I noticed that Oscar-winning actress Renee Zellweger is starring in a new movie. When I saw the publicity shots for the film, my jaw dropped, as it was obvious Ms. Zellweger, at the ripe old age of 39, has had a great deal of cosmetic surgery done on her face. As a result, she now bears a startling resemblance to Nicole Kidman and has all the expressiveness of a Madame Tussaud's mannequin. But darn it, she doesn't have wrinkles anymore, so I suppose it's all for the best! And then there's another Oscar-winning actress, Gabrielle Anwar, who currently stars in USA's hit television show, "Burn Notice." She used to look like this, but now looks like this. Ms. Anwar is certainly anorexic, yet is portrayed as a sexy, irresistible bombshell on the show. No normal woman could ever achieve a look like hers without literally starving herself to death.

Why are actresses refusing to age, and to eat, in order to keep their jobs?

A more pointed question is this: In a world where the feminine principle dominates, do we really think that these women would torture themselves in order to morph into some bizarre, impossible ideal of feminine beauty?

The New Agenda editor Dr. Violet Socks has defined the patriarchy as a vast ocean in which we are all fish, and states that every feminist learns to taste the water at a different time in his or her life. I would like to tweak this metaphor a little, and argue that if we are all fish, we rot from the head first.

In other words, the culture that defines women by their perceived sexuality, youth and fertility is an outgrowth of government. If we change the government, we will change the culture.

150 years ago, black slavery used to be perfectly acceptable; in fact, it was an economically necessary institution for an entire region of America. Now, it is socially abhorrent to think that African-Americans are subhuman creatures who should be considered property, and if violence is perpetrated against a man for the color of his skin, it is correctly termed a hate crime. How did this come about? Certainly the abolitionist movement was important, but until Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves through the agency of government, nothing could really change.

By contrast, women are still slaves throughout the world. Women are raped, beaten and killed every day, and far from gender-based violence being called a hate crime, its incredibly high incidence never seems to penetrate our collective consciousness. I believe that these shocking examples of female disempowerment pass under the cultural radar because womens' equality has still not been recognized directly by our government and is not enshrined in our Constitution. Thus, it is still socially acceptable to think of women as subhuman creatures who can be considered property of males, and to perpetrate violence against them.

As The New Agenda editor Sheryl Robinson noted, this lack of governmental recognition is also leading to a rather disturbing tendency by Barack Obama's new administration to throw womens' rights in the trash solely for perceived political gain. Thus, the Lilly Ledbetter Act passes, but the Fair Paycheck Act is jettisoned. Thus funding for birth control is stripped out of the latest stimulus package in order to court the religious right and gain Republican votes (which was a losing strategy in terms of the stimulus package, but probably a winning one in terms of Mr. Obama's re-election campaign for 2012). All of this is happening as if on an alternate plane of reality, while Ms. Magazine lauds this President as the most feminist-est ever, and the corporate media gushes over how great Mr. Obama looks without a shirt on, and dissects First Lady Michelle Obama's fashion choices as if the fate of the universe hangs upon them.

If we are ever to change the fact that the most common role models for women are anorexics whose faces look as lifeless as plastic dolls, and that second-class citizenship is the norm, not the rule for a female in America, we must focus our efforts on achieving equal representation in government, and in the ratification of the ERA.

Only then will real cultural change come for America's women.

Originally posted at The New Agenda

Share/Save
Your rating: None Average: 5 (3 votes)
5

Two things reached my radar this week as it relates to women and our plight:

1. I heard Jessica Simpson being referred to this week as "fat", "pig", "skank", "no man will ever want her now", blah blah blah blah and more blahs. The truth of the matter is that she is no longer a starved size two and is now at what is probably her normal body size, and she is a size eight. Since when is a size eight worthy of being called "fat", "pig", etc.?   What does her clothing size matter anyway?  Yes, I realize it matters in the sense that near-anorexia is required to work in the entertainment industry.  But whatever her size, it doesn't define her worth as a human being nor entitle media to verbally assault her.

2. And this is stuff that really matters. Femicide in the Congo. Yes, femicide.

Please visit www.thegreatestsilence.org and learn about documentary filmmaker Lisa Jackson's utterly compelling account of the four million dead women of Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) who were systematically raped, tortured and mutilated.

It is my understanding that The Greatest Silence: Rape in the Congo is currently airing on HBO.

And this:  "Rape as Terrorism" - http://terrorism.about.com/b/2009/01/28/rape-as-terrorism.htm

So, what are the solutions?  How can we help?  Some answers here:  http://raisehopeforcongo.org/ 

"Right wing sledge hammers never, ever help us."  Pacific John

I agree with much of what you wrote but when it comes to saying that Gabrielle Anwar is "certainly" anorexic I draw the line. I would say she most certainly is not.

 I love Burn Notice and particularly love that Anwar's character kicks ass on a weekly basis. Love the character. The actress? Not so much. From what I've read she's a bit of a dim bulb. That' s okay with me; I like the character not the person. Just as I love the kick-ass female character Ziva on NCIS. Maybe I just like the idea of women strong enough to kick the crap out of some man.

Evil

Has she had work done? Has Zellweiger? Don't know, don't care. In the world they live and work in looks are everything. If they choose to keep on working by having work done that's their business. And their living. We don’t inhabit that world.

There has to be a happy medium between what Hollywood portrays and what we as women accept. I think Anwar is too thin. But in watching an old clip of her doing the Tango with Pacino in Scent of a Woman, she was about the same size back then. She was also 22 years old as opposed to being 39 now. If she's had work done at least it was well done and she doesn't look like Joan Rivers.   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBHhSVJ_S6A

Women have to decide for themselves if they are going to be silly enough to let Hollywood define their self-image or if they are going to take charge of who and what they are. This constant blame game over whose fault it is some women do not have a healthy image isn't helpful, IMHO.

I know that I could diet myself to death and I would never look like Gabrielle Anwar, as I knew many years ago that I could never look like Audrey Hepburn.

 

A Dishonest/Biased Media Is A Crime Against Democracy!