Visitors' civil comments encouraged.

Obama's Middle East Shift to the Dark Ages


BJinAmerica - Posted on 10 June 2010

Three months ago, President Obama and his White House staff treated Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pretty shabbily. The once key ally was left to his own devices, while the President withdrew to have dinner in private. Obama wouldn’t even allow himself to be photographed with the Israeli Prime Minister. It was an intentional slight by the President, since we know he goes out of his way to bow to the Saudi King and embraces Hugo Chavez.

Netanyahu's treatment should have been a wake-up call to Americans that Obama would not stand with Israel as he promised in the primaries; that he would instead reach out to Islamic forces that seek to destroy the only true democracy in the Middle East. It didn't take long for it to actually haappen. Yesterday, U.S. President Barack Obama hosted Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas at the White House to ensure him that the fallout over the Gaza flotilla would not derail peace efforts.

There was even the photo-op on the left that shows Obama shaking hands with Abbas. Reuters reported that Obama called on Israel to work with all parties to find a solution for Gaza and said the United States is providing $400 million in new aid for the Palestinians. (Did you get that, 400 million to the Palestinians, which means the terrorist organization, Hamas?) It’s an important development, one that should not be ignored. 

Last night, DR Charles Krauthammer didn’t ignore it. Appearing on Special Report, he said that Obama has shifted and reversed the course of American sympathies in the Middle East:

 

  

For those of us, who have been paying attention, Obama’s Middle East shift is far from surprising. Remember Candidate Obama talked about his Muslim faith when he was interviewed by Stephanopoulos for ABC News. The Progressive interviewer corrected him as if it was a slip of the tongue, but the future President was just being honest then. It was one of the many signals that his Presidency would seek a new world order, despite his campaign promises to the contrary.

While Hillary Clinton joined the condemnation of Israel this week, Vice President Joe Biden to his credit was the only member of the Obama administration to defend Israel’s blockade of the Gaza Strip and its decision to intercept the peace activist/terrorist flotilla that claimed “humanitarian aid.” In an interview with Charlie Rose, Vice President Biden pointed out that Israel had given pro-Palestinian terrorist activists the option of unloading their cargo at the Ashdod port, and offered to bring it to the Gaza Strip on their behalf.

In contrast to Obama and Clinton adding to the barrage of condemnations coming from all over the globe, many in the U.S. Congress expressed support for Israel.

House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer said Israel "rightfully invoked its right to self defense."

"Hamas could end the blockade at any time by recognizing Israel’s right to exist, renouncing violence, and releasing Gilad Shalit," Hoyer continued.

 

Other members spoke about why there is a need for the blockade of Gaza in the first place.

The blockade exists "to deny Hamas the weaponry and raw materials it needs to continue its rocket attacks in Israel, killing innocent people," Republican whip Eric Cantor said.

Americans were promised change, but our country is reeling from the kind of change Obama and his people have created in less than 18 months. Americans aren't seeing the type of leadership Obama promised. What we are seeing is in line with the "revolution" Progressive blogger-thugs promised throughout Obama’s campaign.

Progressives desire to de-develop the United States they despise and to create a new world order. Who among us are so blinded by past relationships and MSM propaganda that they cannot recognize the truth, when it is all around us? Naiveté is no excuse; they need to wake up before our great country becomes unrecognizable.

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/06/02/joe-biden-finally-grows-a-brain-defends-israel-over-terrorist-flotilla/

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/25/president-allegedly-dumps-israeli-prime-minister-dinner/

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/biden-israel-right-to-stop-gaza-flotilla-from-breaking-blockade-1.293833

 

Share/Save
Your rating: None Average: 5 (2 votes)
5

Lots of people don't care about tiny Israel so they don't care about Obama's policy shift towards the only free country in the ME. The thing is, they should care because of what that shift means to the US. It means we're weak at home and therefore less safe.

There are forces at work to bring down this country, as we've known it, from within and from outside our borders. We fail to realize that at our own peril.

I ran across something really appalling last night. When the IDF tried to board the Marmara ship, they came aboard armed with paintball guns. I thought, WTF were they thinking? Who's responsible for such a lame tactic? How could the Israeli government be so stupid? Fact is, it was Obama's fault: White House rejected Israeli intel, blocked use of anti-riot gear against flotilla

Also, it turns out there was no aid aboard that Marmara ship: Mavi Mia! : Israellycool.

Also worth reading: Chesler Chronicles » Judt, Obama, Erdogan Join Forces Against Israel

I fear this is going to be one hellacious summer. Speaking of summer, we were at the beach in late May. Good thing, too, because the DelMarVa beaches are extra crowded because of the Gulf oil situation.

5

5

Hamas refuses to allow aid supplies into Gaza

 Goods brought by flotilla pile up in army warehouses because Hamas rejects their entrance by land

Hanan Greenberg Published: 06.07.10, 19:05 / Israel News

"Despite international criticism against Israel following a calamitous IDF raid on an aid flotilla to Gaza, it appeared Monday that Hamas was the one preventing the goods brought by the flotilla from entering the Strip. The army announced Monday that the humanitarian aid brought by the ships had been mostly unloaded, and estimated that the task would be completed in the next few days." 

 

Get that? Hamas won't accept the "aid".

Read the rest at: http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3901662,00.html

 

 

5

They want weapons, explosives, rockets, mortars and raw materials they can use to make things to use against Israel. When it comes to food, medicine, etc., they want for nothing. They want cement to use in smuggling tunnels. 

Or did the ass-kissing suffice?

GONE FISHING

The truth is his administration has sided with fascists from the start. He has been rude to  the English, the French, and the Israelis, but he dots his "i"s and "t"s when it comes to fascists, wherever they reside, It is because he himself prescribes to Socialism and the basic tenets of Communism. It is why so many people in his Administration have Communist ties. 

 

 

 

This section from an article by David Aikman drives that home:

At a recent briefing to scholars and reporters at Washington’s Center for Strategic and International Studies, John Brennan, assistant to the president for homeland security and counter-terrorism, went into contortions to avoid admitting what seems commonsense to most Americans: there is a connection between some parts of Islamic thought and the repeated assertions of Osama bin Laden and his supporters and sympathizers that they are waging “jihad” against the United States. Brennan said the religious views of America’s Islamist terrorist adversaries shouldn’t even be discussed. Yet to accept that view would be like asking the State Department to examine the views of Adolf Hitler during Word War II and avoid mentioning his hatred of the Jews.

 

Brennan said the White House and State Department were avoiding reference to “jihadists” even though terrorist adversaries of the United States often call themselves exactly that. He said that jihad was “a holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam meaning to purify oneself and one’s community.” True, this is the “greater jihad,” as defined by Mohammed himself—but it is not the whole meaning of jihad at all. In fact, serious and respected scholars of Islam such as Professor Bernard Lewis assert that by far the largest proportion of Islamic historical references to jihad refer to what is called the “lesser jihad”—the duty of Muslims to wage war on non-Muslims in order to subdue all countries and communities for Allah.

 

The Quran, Islam’s holy book, is quite explicit about this. Surah 9, for example, the “surah of the sword,” explicitly calls on Muslims to “fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and his Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the book [i.e,. Jews and Christians] until they pay the tax in acknowledgement of superiority and they are in a state of subjection” (Surah 9:29). Just in case readers didn’t get that message, Surah 2:216 says “jihad is enjoined for you, though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing while it is good for you, and it may be that you love a thing while it is evil for you, and Allah knows, while you do not know” (Surah 2:216).

 

Read the rest at: http://townhall.com/columnists/DavidAikman/2010/06/09/islam_and_the_politically_correct_white_house

 

 

 

 

This sequense of events will lead to a very dangerous war. I see very little room to manuver away from it. With China and Russia being on top of their proxy game and the US withdrawing overt public support for Israel, Israel is alone. I am not making any pro or con statement about Israel's recent actions, The bigger picture is a very dark place. 

And yes, 400 million is a payment to Hamas. Iran will see to it that it is well spent, I am certian.

5

The ominous storm clouds of war are gathering and thunder may rumble before the end of the year. At stake is the continued existence of Israel and whether or not the world will tolerate a nuclear armed Iran, nuclear blackmail, and nuclear terrorism.

Iran to intensify clothing curbs, citing ‘Islamic values’ (1.5 Billion for Female Dress Code and Moral Conduct.)

by

Bloomberg

 Iranian authorities increase their enforcement of the women’s dress code annually to prevent them from abandoning Islamic dress.(Getty Images)

Iran will step up measures to force retailers selling clothing to comply with “Islamic values,” according to the police.

“Producing and distributing inappropriate clothes, those not complying with Islamic and Iranian culture, should be avoided,” Abbas Miraei, who heads the Office of Supervision of the Public Sphere for the Iranian police, was cited as saying today by Iranian Labour News Agency. Further details weren’t immediately available.

Iran has set aside $1.5 billion to promote “moral conduct,” including enforcement of its dress code for women, “to solve the cultural and social ills” in society, Interior Minister Mostafa Mohammad-Najjar said on May 10. His comments followed the introduction of a code of conduct at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences that bans loud laughter, nail polish, high heels and immodest clothing for women and men.

Read the rest at http://www.arabianbusiness.com/590249-iran-to-intensify-curbs-on-clothing-citing-islamic-values

 

 

Madam GaGa as a fashion consultant.  )

Twandx, so good to see you.  I don't know if you have seen the story concerning breast feeding and Saudi Arabia's Sharia Law edict.  

 

JUNE 7, 2010 3:12PM

Adult Breastfeeding Establishes "Maternal Relations"...


Sounds to Me Like Some Countries Have Mommy Issues...
 

As many of us know, women and men in Saudi Arabia must be careful not to mingle, as the insanely strict Islamic law bans mixing between the sexes who are not related. Recently, the Saudis have issued a fatwa that forces women who come into contact with unrelated men on a regular basis to breastfeed them so that they can be considered “relatives” and not potential lovers. The strangest part is, this isn’t the actual issue at hand. The issue is, how do the men get the milk? I know, it just gets weirder.

According to the Gulf News, Sheikh Al Obeikan, a consultant to the Ministry of Justice and an adviser to the royal court stated, “the man should take the milk, but not directly from the breast of the woman. He should drink it and then becomes a relative of the family, a fact that allows him to come in contact with the woman without breaking Islam’s rules about mixing.”

This fatwa applies to men who regularly come into contact with the same woman, or men who live in the same house with a woman. The woman has to pump her breast milk into a glass and give it to the unrelated male. Doesn’t that sound appetizing?

But, not all agree with giving the milk in such a way. Oh, no. Another high-profile sheik, Abi Ishaq Al Huwaini, believes that the men should suckle the breast milk directly from the woman’s breast. Now we are talking! How is it that you can get close enough to suckle, though, without getting thrown in jail? If the genders aren’t allowed to mix, how could you do this without the religious police on your ass? This is serious stuff! Under this strict Islamic law, women aren’t allowed to vote, drive, or leave the country without the consent of a male “guardian”....

Please read the rest at: http://open.salon.com/blog/twodaymag/2010/06/07/women_forced_to_breastfeed_adult_men_in_saudi_arabia

 

 

 

From the Times of London:

Saudi Arabia has conducted tests to stand down its air defences to enable Israeli jets to make a bombing raid on Iran’s nuclear facilities, The Times can reveal.

In the week that the UN Security Council imposed a new round of sanctions on Tehran, defence sources in the Gulf say that Riyadh has agreed to allow Israel to use a narrow corridor of its airspace in the north of the country to shorten the distance for a bombing run on Iran.

To ensure the Israeli bombers pass unmolested, Riyadh has carried out tests to make certain its own jets are not scrambled and missile defence systems not activated. Once the Israelis are through, the kingdom’s air defences will return to full alert....

I guess the Sunnis hate the Shiite more than they hate the Israelis. Read the rest at:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article7148555.ece

 

 

Saudi Arabia would not allow Israeli bombers to pass through its airspace en route to a possible strike of Iran's nuclear facilities, a member of the Saudi royal family said Saturday, denying an earlier Times of London report.

 

 

5

Besides, it's an old story. Don't know why the Times chose to run it now.

I'm expecting something to happen within the next 4 to 8 weeks. There's no choice now, it's do or die—literally.

I think it's guided by Bryzezinski and Rice, and we know whose side they both are on. (I am not liking what I'm seeing in the State Department. Clinton has done a poor job in my book.)

 Bryzezinski should have been jailed after his Carter Iran fiasco, he is a malevolent force. Rice has the credentials, but seems to like being the focus of attention at diplomatic parties more than doing the hard stuff. (Come to think of it, that's a good thing, because she is another far-left loony that embraces America's enemies.)

Of course, from their view, Obama foreign policy is not inept, because they seek to de-develop us.

 

 

The Saudi's are use to having Israel as a foil.  If iran takes this away or changes the dynamic it won't be just Israel involved.

BO is a vacuum that is allowing this to happen in.

 

Partizane ROCKS!