Visitors' civil comments encouraged.

Iran Is Still There, Mr. President


BJinAmerica - Posted on 26 July 2009

Ever since President Obama returned from his Middle East Apology Tour, he has pretty much publicly avoided the subject of Iran, which should give every American pause. Remember this Imperial President did say that we could not stop another country from attaining nuclear capabilities, just before all hell broke lose in Iran over a rigged presidential election.  Since then, the world has witnessed the ruthless treatment of Iranian citizens by  Khamenei and Ahmadinejad.

Iranian military police and imported Hezbollah and Hamas thugs wrecked havoc on unarmed Iranian protesters. Some were brutally beaten; some were murdered. Word has it that Iranian Green Party members were picked up after the protests were quelled, that they were imprisoned and tortured. Some Iranians died as a result; some are still imprisoned.

Many of us will never forget the murder of the young Iranian woman named Neda. Since the ruling Iranian government has no qualms about killing its young people, it is doubtful that it would restrain itself in the use of nuclear weapons. So what’s up with the POTUS and Iran?

The fact that Obama finally did utter something about Iran in Europe doesn't really carry any weight, since he seemed shamed into it by Sarkozy and other outspoken leaders of the Free World who still have a backbone. Since then, the POTUS gives the impression that he can’t bother his pretty little head about Iran. Why is that?

Yesterday people in more than 60 cities around the globe stood together in a Global Day of Action to express solidarity with the People of Iran. Did Obama speak out yesterday? Nobel Peace Laureate Archbishop Desmond Tutu supports the people of Iran and his comments are worth a hearing.

 

To his credit, Representative Thaddeus McCotter (Michigan) spoke on the floor of the House of Representatives to present the story of yet another Iranian female martyr, 19 year-old Taraneh Mousavi pictured on the right. Ms Mousavi was arrested by Basij thugs in Tehran for wearing a green scarf in protest against an illegitimate election. It has been reported that Taraneh Mousavi was beaten, raped, tortured; that her body was burned to prevent an autopsy; and that her parents have been threatened by the regime to be silent. On July 20, McCotter made Mousavi’s story part of the Congressional Record. His speech bears repeating:

“Madam Speaker, the Iranian people's peaceful struggle for freedom continues despite the tyrannical regime's barbarous crackdown. In fact, in his Friday's sermon, former President Rafsanjani called into question the legitimacy of the present government and rebuked the regime for its crackdown on peaceful protesters and its cavalier rejection of the cries that the election was stolen.

Finally, former President Rafsanjani called upon the regime to free and fully account for all those peaceful freedom seekers who have been arrested in the repression. Then, on Sunday, former President Khatami called for a referendum on the legitimacy of the Iranian regime and asked that the results be tallied by an objective independent Iranian body to ensure its accuracy.

This led the current opposition, Presidential candidate Hossein Mousavi, to say: 'You are facing something new, an awakened nation, a nation that has been born again and is here to defend its achievements. Arrests won't put an end to this problem. End this game as soon as possible and return to the nation its arrested sons.'

While humanity agrees, Supreme Leader Khamenei disagrees. And to leaders who both tacitly and expressly support the freedom seekers in Iran, Khamenei issued this warning: 'The elite should be watchful since they have been faced with a big test. Failing the test will cause their collapse.'

I'd ask Supreme Leader Khamenei to look at this picture. Her name is Taraneh Mousavi. She was arrested near Ghoba Mosque, where she was on her way to attend hairdressing college. After her arrest, she was raped, sodomized and tortured by her captors, taken to a hospital in a coma, and it was there that she died. Upon her death, her body was removed to the outskirts of Karaj Qasim where, to prevent an autopsy, it was burned.

She came from a religious family. Taraneh was only 19 and an only child. Her family has been threatened to keep quiet, and yet the resistance wants her story out. Why? Because here's the truth denied by Khamenei and his misogynistic, murderous regime: ' Your referendum has been held and you have failed your test. Taraneh and Neda condemn you as the despicable killers of women. You have no legitimacy either in the eyes of the Iranian people or in the eyes of the civilized world. You are doomed by your own hands, and it is but a matter of time until your regime collapses and the Iranian people breathe free.'

So ask yourself, "why is The Leader of the the Free World silent?" Why no comments about Iran from his administration? Obama must know his silence emboldens Khamenei and his hand-picked President. 

Despite reports of the brutality of the Basij militia against the Iranian people, neither the POTUS or his representatives in his administration speak out.  Why is that? Representative John Batchelor claims to have intelligence that Obama still wants  to negotiate with Tehran, to add to a bargain offered by the Bush administration.

I thought we had hit rock bottom with Bush and Cheney, but now it seems we can descend to new lows with Obama and his crew. Our country under Obama no longer has a leader who speaks out against human rights atrocities; the murder of innocents; and fraudulent elections that discount the will of the people. Instead, under Obama, we can now look forward to negotiating with thugs, who sanction the rape and murder of women and the torture of opponents. Instead, under Obama, we can negotiate with thugs who rig elections, and we can sanction nuclear capabilities on their behalf so as to render them capable of using nuclear weapons against our allies and us. 

Unfortunately, change doesn't necessarily mean we're moving up. Obama isn't talking. Isn't there one Democratic woman who still has her own voice?

 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 
 

 

Share/Save
Your rating: None Average: 5 (3 votes)

BJ, thank you for bringing the protests in Iran back to the forefront.  I read about this lovely young woman's death yesterday.  When I read about those horrible things that were done to Taraneh, I just wanted to scream.  I'm glad Rep. McCotter made that speech on the House floor.  Thank you for posting it here.

he would conduct an investigation and put the men who committed the atrocities against Taraneh on trial. Since he has not, his actions indicate he condones the treatment of this young woman. His actions speak volumes about his character. How can Obama feel so comfortable reaching out to the likes of him?  

 

 

but don't expect much from the O-bot for awhile at least.  He's much too busy having his foot amputated from his mouth so he can drink beer with the boys and make it all go away.  Although the kom by yah-beer fest may not be held in the rose garden, the locus will be spread with rose petals to make him come out smelling like a rose and everyone will don their free rose-colored glasses and dance around the rose pole.

Sometimes there doesn't seem to be a clear head in the group and like you I don't see most of  them taking off their rose-colored glasses soon. These players are speeding the demise of both cable news and published newspapers by their behavior.

I think you'd enjoy Jon Friedman's assessment of Obama in "Does Obama Talk Too Much for his Own Good?" at http://www.marketwatch.com/story/does-president-obama-talk-to-us-too-much-2009-07-24

It is in this commentary that Friedman says Obama "is risking the possibility of turning off the media -- and, in turn, the nation -- by continuously failing to make detailed proposals. He has to do more than show up...."

 

 

5

Our president should stand for the principles upon which this nation was founded. It's a disgrace to go around the world apologizing for everything when this country has given so much to the world. How many lives have we lost in the defense of freedom around the world? How much aid have we given to rebuild nations ravaged by war and natural disasters? Have we done some things to protect our country that others didn't like? You bet but we have done far more good than harm.

We should always shine a light on those who wish to bring freedom to their country and applaud the efforts of those fighting tyranny. For any president to have remained silent as long as Obama did while Iranian protesters were dying in the streets of Tehran is unconscionable.  

For any president to have remained silent as long as Obama did while Iranian protesters were dying in the streets of Tehran is unconscionable.  

I don't recall Obama remaining silent at all. 

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31507917

In any case, Obama is the President of the United States, not the leader of the Iranian reform movement.  It is up to the Iranian people how their destiny plays out.  Our intervention in that nation in the past is why they are suffering so much today.  Had we not intervened some 50+yrs ago, and let Mossadegh continue to rule democratically, Iran would be a flourishing, liberated democracy today.

So much so that he drew a lot of criticism for his silence and then when he finally did speak up, what he said was wimpy. The protesters were begging for some sort of supportive words from the US, a country they look up to and admire. One of the things they admire about us is the fact that we got rid of Saddam.

The protesters were begging for some sort of supportive words from the US, a country they look up to and admire.

I'm sorry, but that is a seriously wrongheaded assumption about America's ability to influence events on the ground in Iran.  The truth is that most Iranians loathe America, loathe American influence and hegemony, and would utterly reject any attempt by America to intervene in Iranian politics.  We have done that before, with absolutely disastrous consequences.  A little realism goes a long way.

One of the things they admire about us is the fact that we got rid of Saddam.

Ron, do you actually believe that the Iranian people supported our invasion of Iraq?

Here's another question: do you support our invasion of Iraq?

I'm talking about the protesters and you're twisting that to mean the people of Iran. Why?

Like all of the Democrats I respected and admired, I supported our efforts to rid Iraq of Saddam. I don't like the fact that Bush and Tenet's CIA lied to us and that the Office of Special Plans in the Pentagon twisted the intelligence. Even so, I'm glad Saddam is gone.

I apologize, Ron. You're right, you said the protestors, not the people as a whole.  I misunderstood. 

I still strongly disagree with your premise that the protestors look to America for leadership on this issue.  I also couldn't think of a more poorly judged action in our country's history than the Iraq War.  Any of the Democrats who enabled Bush into dragging our country into that tragic quagmire lost my respect and support long ago.

Ron, Obama loves that he is POTUS, but he doesn't seem to embrace the country or its principles. Since he couldn't remember the number of American states or the geography of the Great Lakes on the campaign trail; he doesn't seem to have the grasp of our history that Clinton and Bush the Elder share. He has spent too many years with people like William Ayers and Jeremiah Wright for them not to have rubbed off on him. As you point out, America has done many great things in its history, but Obama doesn't get it.

In addition, don't forget that Obama is a product of both Chicago and Illinois politics, where politicians serve themselves and if the people benefit as a byproduct that's fine by them and if the people don't benefit it's still fine.

Finally, you said: "For any president to have remained silent as long as Obama did while Iranian protesters were dying in the streets of Tehran is unconscionable." I agree.  

 

 

 

 Appreciate it. Smiling

Instead, under Obama, we can negotiate with thugs who rig elections, and we can sanction nuclear capabilities on their behalf so as to render them capable of using nuclear weapons against our allies and us. 

Hillary on Meet The Press today said that no, Iran will not be permitted to get nuclear weapons. There is a possibility of the nuclear umbrella she had mentioned during the campaign, should negotiations fail.

If you have not seen it, I urge you to watch the video.

However, the question is: "Does she really speak for Obama?" He has not allowed HC the access to power that other SOS's have received, and frankly he speaks with a forked tongue when it comes to Iran and Israel. I hope HC's Meet the Press appearance marks a change in his past practice. She deserves better treatment, and the American people need her untethered so that she can freely work on our behalf.

Has Obama had a change of heart? We can only hope. ( If it is the case, I look forward to your dramatic rendition of the event. )

 

 

I wondered about that, too. 

Will Obama jerk the rug out from under Hillary again on this one?

BTW, the Rasumssen Daily Tracking Poll has Obama's approval margin at -11.  That's down from an initial high of +28. 

The President received generally poor grades for his response to a question about a Cambridge police incident involving a black Harvard professor. However, the results show a huge divide between black Americans and white Americans on all questions.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administra...

The second sentence in that quote is ominous.

GONE FISHING

my first diary on Iran:

At the time, I worried about the girls. Doesn't the girl on the right look like Taraneh Mousavi?

This is such a waste of human potential; why do these men hate their women? Taraneh was only 19 years old. She was raped and sodomized by a gang of cowards, whose actions were sanctioned by the Iranian government. Where is President Carter? Where is the UN? Where is the outrage?